8.1 Momelotinib

8.2 Luspatercept

  • A recombinant fusion protein that acts as a transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) trap and ultimately works to improve anemia by inhibiting growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11).

  • GDF11 is a key inhibitor of late-stage erythroid differentiation, which has been shown to be upregulated in MDS and MF patients

8.2.1 INDEPENCE Trial

The INDEPENDENCE trial (NCT04717414) evaluated luspatercept, a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent, for the treatment of anemia in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) receiving concomitant JAK inhibitor therapy. The trial did not meet its primary endpoint (p = 0.0674), though several secondary endpoints demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits. This review critically examines the trial design, results, and implications for clinical practice.

ImportantKey Finding

Primary endpoint missed statistical significance by a narrow margin, raising important questions about endpoint selection, sample size, and the heterogeneity of MF-associated anemia.

8.2.1.1 Trial Overview

8.2.2 Background and Rationale

Anemia represents one of the most challenging aspects of myelofibrosis management, affecting approximately 50% of patients at diagnosis and nearly all patients during disease progression. The pathophysiology is multifactorial:

Multifactorial Pathophysiology of MF-Associated Anemia
Contributing Factor Mechanism Clinical Impact
Bone marrow fibrosis Replacement of hematopoietic tissue Progressive decline in RBC production
Ineffective erythropoiesis Dysregulated TGF-β signaling Premature erythroid precursor apoptosis
Hypersplenism Splenic sequestration Shortened RBC survival
JAK inhibitor therapy Suppression of JAK-STAT signaling Treatment-induced anemia
Chronic inflammation Elevated hepcidin levels Iron sequestration

8.2.3 Drug Mechanism

Luspatercept (ACE-536) is a recombinant fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap for select TGF-β superfamily members:

flowchart LR
    A[TGF-β Ligands] --> B[Luspatercept]
    B --> C[Reduced Smad2/3 Signaling]
    C --> D[Enhanced Late-Stage Erythropoiesis]
    D --> E[Improved RBC Maturation]

Luspatercept Mechanism of Action

8.2.3.1 Trial Design

8.2.4 Study Structure

INDEPENDENCE Trial Design Summary
Parameter Specification
ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04717414
Phase 3
Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Sponsor Bristol Myers Squibb (with Merck collaboration)
Enrollment ~313 patients
Treatment Arms Luspatercept vs. Placebo
Concomitant Therapy Stable JAK2 inhibitor (required)

8.2.5 Key Eligibility Criteria

8.2.5.1 Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria
Criterion Specification Rationale
Age ≥18 years Standard adult population
Diagnosis MPN-associated myelofibrosis Target population
JAK2i therapy ≥32 weeks total, ≥16 weeks stable dose Ensure stable background therapy
Transfusion burden 4–12 RBC units per 12 weeks Clinically meaningful anemia
ECOG PS ≤2 Adequate functional status

8.2.5.2 Exclusion Criteria

Key Exclusion Criteria
Criterion Rationale
Anemia from other identifiable causes Isolate MF-specific anemia
Hematopoietic agents within 8 weeks Avoid confounding
Prior luspatercept exposure Treatment-naive population
Active malignancy Safety consideration

8.2.6 Endpoints

INDEPENDENCE Trial Endpoints
Endpoint Type Definition Timeframe
Primary RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for any consecutive 12-week period Within first 24 weeks
Key Secondary RBC-TI for any consecutive 16-week period Within first 24 weeks
Secondary ≥50% reduction in RBC transfusion burden (by ≥4 units) Weeks 1–24
Secondary Hemoglobin increase ≥1 g/dL with RBC-TI ≥12 weeks During treatment
Exploratory Duration of response, quality of life Long-term follow-up

8.2.6.1 Results

8.2.7 Primary Endpoint Analysis

WarningStatistical Outcome

p = 0.0674 — The trial did not achieve statistical significance at α = 0.05

Primary Endpoint Results
Outcome Luspatercept Placebo Difference
12-week RBC-TI Higher (exact % pending full publication) Lower Numerical improvement
Statistical significance — — p = 0.0674 (NS)

8.2.8 Secondary Endpoints

Secondary Endpoint Summary
Endpoint Luspatercept Placebo Clinical Interpretation
≥50% transfusion burden reduction Higher proportion Lower Clinically meaningful benefit
Hgb increase ≥1 g/dL + TI ≥12 weeks Higher proportion Lower Clinically meaningful benefit
16-week RBC-TI Pending Pending Key secondary endpoint

8.2.9 Safety Profile

Safety Summary
Adverse Event Category Observation
Treatment-emergent AEs Consistent with known luspatercept profile
Serious AEs Similar between arms
Discontinuation rate Not elevated vs. placebo

8.2.9.1 Critical Analysis

8.2.10 Strengths

Trial Strengths
Strength Significance
Rigorous design Double-blind, placebo-controlled eliminates bias
Clinically relevant population Patients on stable JAKi with meaningful transfusion burden
Novel mechanism First TGF-β ligand trap in MF anemia
Secondary endpoint success Multiple clinically meaningful benefits demonstrated
Consistent with Phase 2 Results align with prior 26–27% RBC-TI rates

8.2.11 Limitations and Concerns

Critical Limitations
Limitation Critical Assessment
Narrow miss on primary endpoint p = 0.0674 suggests potential underpowering or endpoint stringency
12-week TI threshold Binary endpoint may not capture clinically meaningful partial responses
Heterogeneous population MF anemia etiology varies; subgroups may respond differently
Concomitant JAKi variability Different JAK inhibitors may interact differently with luspatercept
No head-to-head comparison Cannot directly compare to momelotinib’s anemia benefits

8.2.12 Statistical Considerations

Code
# Hypothetical power analysis illustration
# Given p = 0.0674, exploring what would achieve significance

library(pwr)

# If observed effect size was d = 0.25 (small-medium)
# With n = 156 per arm (313 total)
power_observed <- pwr.t.test(n = 156, d = 0.25, sig.level = 0.05, type = "two.sample")

# To achieve 80% power at observed effect size
n_needed <- pwr.t.test(d = 0.25, sig.level = 0.05, power = 0.80, type = "two.sample")
Statistical Considerations
Statistical Parameter Consideration
Sample size ~313 patients may have been marginally underpowered
Effect size Smaller than anticipated from Phase 2
Alpha threshold Traditional α = 0.05 may be arbitrary for this context
Multiple testing Hierarchical testing preserved type I error control

8.2.12.1 Comparison with Competing Approaches

8.2.13 Anemia-Targeting Therapies in MF

Comparative Landscape for MF Anemia
Agent Mechanism Key Advantage Key Limitation
Momelotinib JAK1/2 + ACVR1 inhibition Hepcidin suppression + JAKi effects Integrated therapy only
Pacritinib JAK2 + ACVR1 inhibition Use in severe thrombocytopenia Limited anemia data
Luspatercept TGF-β ligand trap Novel mechanism, add-on therapy Primary endpoint missed
Danazol Androgenic steroid Long clinical experience Variable response, virilization
ESAs Erythropoietin stimulation Well-established Poor response in MF

8.2.14 Mechanistic Differentiation

Mechanistic Comparison
Feature Luspatercept Momelotinib
Primary target TGF-β superfamily ligands ACVR1 (ALK2) + JAK1/2
Downstream effect Smad2/3 inhibition Hepcidin suppression
Stage of erythropoiesis affected Late-stage maturation Iron availability
Use context Add-on to JAKi Replacement JAKi
Regulatory status (MF) Investigational FDA approved (2023)

8.2.14.1 Clinical Implications

8.2.15 For Current Practice

NoteClinical Takeaway

While INDEPENDENCE did not achieve its primary endpoint, the totality of evidence suggests luspatercept provides clinically meaningful anemia benefits in a subset of MF patients.

Practical Considerations
Scenario Recommendation
JAKi-treated MF with moderate anemia Consider momelotinib switch or await regulatory decision on luspatercept
Patients preferring add-on therapy Luspatercept may offer value if approved
Severe thrombocytopenia with anemia Pacritinib remains preferred

8.2.16 Regulatory Outlook

Regulatory Considerations
Factor Assessment
Primary endpoint Not met (negative for traditional approval pathway)
Secondary endpoints Multiple clinically meaningful benefits
Unmet need Substantial — few effective anemia therapies
Safety Favorable, consistent with prior experience
Potential pathway Possible accelerated approval or expanded indication

8.2.16.1 Future Directions

8.2.17 Ongoing and Planned Studies

Related Clinical Development
Study Design Population Status
ODYSSEY Phase 2, luspatercept + momelotinib Transfusion-dependent MF Ongoing
Biomarker analyses Post-hoc from INDEPENDENCE Responder identification Planned

8.2.18 Unanswered Questions

  1. Can biomarkers identify optimal responders?
    • TGF-β pathway activation markers
    • Baseline erythroid precursor characteristics
  2. Is combination with momelotinib synergistic?
    • Dual targeting of ineffective erythropoiesis and iron restriction
  3. Does longer treatment duration improve TI rates?
    • 24-week assessment may be premature for some patients
  4. Are there differences by JAK inhibitor backbone?
    • Ruxolitinib vs. fedratinib vs. pacritinib

8.2.18.1 Conclusions

Summary Assessment
Aspect Assessment
Trial execution Well-designed and rigorously conducted
Primary endpoint Missed statistical significance (p = 0.0674)
Clinical relevance Secondary endpoints show meaningful benefit
Place in therapy Uncertain pending regulatory decisions
Unmet need addressed Partially — options for MF anemia remain limited
TipBottom Line

The INDEPENDENCE trial represents a near-miss that highlights the challenges of developing therapies for the heterogeneous syndrome of MF-associated anemia. While the primary endpoint was not achieved, the consistent signal of clinical benefit across secondary endpoints suggests luspatercept may yet find a role in selected patients. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers and exploring rational combinations.

8.2.18.2 References

Abdelmagid, Maymona, Jeanne M. Palmer, Aref Al-Kali, et al. 2025. “Predictors of Response to Pacritinib Therapy and Survival Among 60 Mayo Clinic Patients with Myelofibrosis Treated Outside of Clinical Trials.” Haematologica, ahead of print, March 20. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.287576.
Chen, Lijuan, Yongsheng Wang, Jie Wang, Linyu Yang, and Ting Niu. 2024. “First-in-Human Phase i/IIa Safety and Efficacy of Flonoltinib Maleate, a New Generation of JAK2/FLT3 Inhibitor in Myelofibrosis.” Blood 144 (Supplement 1): 486–86. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-210674.
Hernandez-Boluda, Juan Carlos, Adrian Mosquera Orgueira, Luuk Gras, et al. 2025. “Use of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Poor Survival After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis.” Blood Journal, ahead of print, March 27. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024027287.
Knuth, Donald E. 1984. “Literate Programming.” Comput. J. (USA) 27 (2): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/27.2.97.
Srisuwananukorn, Andrew, Giuseppe Gaetano Loscocco, Andrew T. Kuykendall, et al. 2023. “Interpretable Artificial Intelligence (AI) Differentiates Prefibrotic Primary Myelofibrosis (prePMF) from Essential Thrombocythemia (ET): A Multi-Center Study of a New Clinical Decision Support Tool.” Blood 142 (Supplement 1): 901–1. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2023-173877.

8.2.19 Key Sources

  1. Bristol Myers Squibb Press Release. July 18, 2025. INDEPENDENCE Trial Topline Results.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04717414
  3. Gerds AT, et al. ASCO 2023. Phase 2 luspatercept in MF (NCT03194542).
  4. Chifotides HT, et al. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2025. Emerging Therapeutic Approaches for Anemia in Myelofibrosis. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-025-00751-4

8.3 DISC-0974

  • DISC-0974 is a monoclonal antibody that binds to hemojuvelin and blocks bone morphogenetic protein signaling, thereby suppressing hepcidin production.
  • Pathologic elevations in hepcidin, a key regulator of iron homeostasis, contribute to anemia of inflammation in chronic disease.
  • Chronic hepcidin elevation limits iron availability for red blood cell production and contributes to onset and severity of anemia

8.3.1 ASH 2024

  • N= 34

  • Enrolled at 5 dose levels: 14 mg (n=1), 28 mg (n=7), 50 mg (n=12), 75 mg (n=8), and 100 mg (n=6).

  • Hemoglobin responses were achieved in 69% (20/29) of nTD participants; 60% of nTD participants (9/15) achieved a durable response.

  • One of two evaluable TD participants achieved TI at the end of study. All evaluable participants with a baseline transfusion requirement (n=8) had ≥50% reduction in transfusions over a rolling 8-week window compared to baseline.

  • Hematologic response was observed in 6 of 10 participants with concomitant JAK inhibitor therapy.

8.3.2 Phase 2 Study (ASC0 2026 Abstract)

RALLY-MF (NCT05320198)

Per [[sources/gangat-2026-disc-0974-rally-mf-asco-abstract|Gangat 2026 ASCO Abstract #6501]] (Oral; data cutoff 16 Oct 2025):

8.3.2.1 Design

  • Phase 2, open-label, multi-center US.
  • Eligibility: adults with primary or secondary MF + Hgb <10 g/dL OR RBC transfusion requirement.
  • Concomitant JAKi allowed (stable dose) — 53% of cohort.
  • Dose: 50 mg SC monthly up to 6 doses; escalate to 75 mg SC for inadequate/lost response.
  • n=47 across 3 transfusion-burden cohorts.

8.3.2.2 Cohorts + primary endpoints — ALL MET

Cohort n Primary endpoint Result
nTD (0 units, Hgb <10) 30 Hgb ≥1.5 g/dL increase ≥12 wks 50%
TD low (1-2 units) 10 Transfusion independence ≥16 wks 71%
TD high (3-12 units) 7 ≥50% transfusion reduction 67%

8.3.2.3 Concomitant JAKi-stratified efficacy

  • Major hematologic response 50% ON concomitant JAKi (n=18).
  • Major hematologic response 50% OFF JAKi (n=16).
  • Equivalent response on either backbone — confirms DISC-0974 works as monotherapy AND as add-on.

8.3.2.4 Patient-reported outcomes

  • Meaningful FACIT-Fatigue improvements in nTD + TD-low.

8.3.2.5 Safety

  • SAEs n=9; ≥G3 AEs n=16 — ALL considered unrelated to DISC-0974.
  • No early withdrawals due to AEs.
  • “Well tolerated; favorable safety profile.”

8.3.2.6 Dosing

  • 50 mg SC monthly — convenient outpatient schedule.
  • Escalate to 75 mg SC for inadequate or lost response.
  • Up to 6 doses in RALLY-MF; long-term chronic dosing presumed for future development.

8.3.2.7 Toxicity

Per RALLY-MF preliminary readout:

  • No drug-related SAEs at data cutoff.
  • No drug-related ≥G3 AEs at data cutoff.
  • No AE-related discontinuations.
  • Theoretical concerns (not observed at data cutoff but worth monitoring):
    • Iron overload from chronic hepcidin suppression (hepatic / cardiac).
    • Anti-drug antibody (ADA) development.
    • Anaphylactic / hypersensitivity reactions to chronic SC mAb.
    • Hypophosphatemia (HJV blockade may indirectly affect FGF23/phosphate handling — speculative).

8.4 DISC-0998

  • Anti-HJV monoclonal antibody
  • Extended half-life
  • Being studies in Anemia Associated with Inflammatory Diseases